 |
Basic Evidence of
Conspiracy in the Assassination of President Kennedy
If you've always wondered why people think there was a
conspiracy - here's a quick little set of some of the basic glaring discrepancies in the
government's case on this. |
|
|
The Posthumous Assassination of John F. Kennedy
Why would one commit a political assassination if not to get rid of a
perceived threat? The threat Kennedy's legacy posed was as big as the threat the man
himself posed, if not bigger. It was not enough to kill the man, when so many grieved his
passing. It became necessary to kill his reputation so that no one would care who killed
him or what his death portended. Read a well-written discussion of this campaign, and how
Sy Hersh's book is the latest in a long line of similar efforts. |
|
|
The Garrison Investigation and
the Trial of Clay Shaw
Jim Garrison was the New Orleans District Attorney who has so far been the
only public official with any kind of authority to actually bring someone to trial for
participation in a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. Examine his case, and the
FBI media assets working avowedly to undermine him. And hear Garrison put his own case
forward, refuting his contemporary critics, in the famous Playboy interview.
|
|
|
Oliver Stone: Killing the Messenger
Oliver Stone has consistently made movies that have gone against the grain
of the "conventional wisdom." But all toleration of opposing views ended when it
was revealed he was doing a film on the Kennedy assassination.
Read how the media critics took
off after a film that had not even finished shooting (JFK)! Some of the same media voices
misrepresented evidence in the past, but never acknowledged their own mistakes.
A separate article outlines the latest attack
on Stone as he examines Richard Nixon, Watergate, and "that Bay of Pigs thing"
in his film Nixon.
|
|
|
Executive Session Testimony:
McKeown
This is one of the most interesting interviews taken of a witness. But be warned! It's around 100 pages! Skip it until you
have the time, or read bits and try to remember where you left off. Robert McKeown was a
gunrunner who knew Castro, met Ruby and also met Oswald. The HSCA (House Select Committee
on Assassinations - 1977-79) tried to badger, cajole, harass and initimidate this witness
into changing his story. He never did. See what kind of pressure
others were under through this example.
|
|
|
The Media, the CIA
and the JFK Assassination
The Media Center of the Real History Archives carries several documents that attest to the
involvement of specific journalists with the CIA. As Carl
Bernstein's article The CIA and the Media shows, the CIA often employs
journalists, sometimes as parttime informants and other times as full-fledged covert
operators. No wonder we haven't heard the truth about the Kennedy assassination, when the
CIA controls the media mouthpieces on the subject! Lastly, you can find the famous
|
|
|
CTKA
/ Probe Magazine
There are over 60 free articles on this site relating to the Kennedy
assassination and other traumatic events of the sixties. CTKA stands for Citizens for
Truth about the Kennedy Assassination. This group shows how the events of the present
day are illuminated by a better knowledge of the past and its players. Read and learn. |
| |
The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, Malcolm X, MLK and RFK
Edited by Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease
The Last Investigation
By Gaeton Fonzi
Destiny Betrayed: JFK, Cuba and the Garrison Case
By Jim DiEugenioOswald and the CIA
By John Newman
Let Justice Be Done
By William Davy
Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK?
By Mark Lane
On the Trail of the Assassins
By Jim Garrison
The Men Who Killed Kennedy
Inside the CIA, Vol. 1 - History
Inside the CIA, Vol. 2 - Assassination
Inside the CIA, Vol. 3 - Subversion
CIA - The Secret Files (4 tape set) |
|
People often ask,
"Why does the Kennedy assassination still matter?"
It's a good question, and one worthy of a longer and
more detailed response than you'll find here. Ultimately each person needs to answer that
for themselves, but here's one response:
When the government can flat out lie to its citizens
about the death of its own President, when the truth is knowable, when the conspirators
still living are not prosecuted, when the accessories after the fact still grind out the
disinformation, when a concerted campaign to publish books promoting the big lie can go
unchallenged, and when the media is not held accountable for its participation in the 30+
year cover-up, then our constitution is meaningless, our laws without substance, our
people without hope of ever participating in the pseudo-democracy that passes for America.
If we allow ourselves to be
lied to in so blatant a fashion about something as important as the assassination of a
president, can we really expect the government or the media to tell us the truth about
anything at all after that? Is that why Watergate happened? Iran-Contra? If
no one is held accountable, than anything goes. We are only
just now finding out about an operation during the Vietnam war to spray nerve gas on
deserters. What is going on now that we cannot know for another thirty years?
George Orwell wrote in his famous book 1984, "Who
controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."
He wasn't being facetious. He was giving us a strong warning, and one that should be well
heeded.
Don't give up your history. It's too
important.
|
